<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>emre şahin's digital garden 🍃 - codecov</title>
    <link>https://emresahin.net/tags/codecov/</link>
    <description>Posts in the codecov tag</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>contact@emresahin.net (Emre Şahin)</managingEditor>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emresahin.net/tags/codecov/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>devlog 12</title>
      <published>2025-01-19T09:46:29+00:00</published>
      <updated>2025-01-19T09:46:29+00:00</updated>
      <author>Emre Şahin</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://emresahin.net/devlog-12/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://emresahin.net/devlog-12/</guid>
      <description>🐢 What are today’s plans? 🐇 I think we can start by improving xvc.py. I mean, releasing. Yesterday we finished our work with the Rust library. 🐢 Then we can start to look at the GUI, I believe. We can replace that 3-column view with a table and preview. It will be much easier that way. 🐇 Yep. Let...</description>
      <category>xvc</category>
      <category>xvc.py</category>
      <category>pypi</category>
      <category>maturin</category>
      <category>pytest</category>
      <category>xvc-test-helper</category>
      <category>codecov</category>
      <category>coverage</category>
      <category>GitHub Actions</category>
      <category>Python</category>
      <category>Rust</category>
      <category>PyO3</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>🐢 What are today’s plans?</p>
<p>🐇 I think we can start by improving xvc.py. I mean, releasing. Yesterday we finished our work with the Rust library.</p>
<p>🐢 Then we can start to look at the GUI, I believe. We can replace that 3-column view with a table and preview. It will be much easier that way.</p>
<p>🐇 Yep. Let’s finish and release the Python version first. Then we’ll go on to the GUI.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s take a look at the PRs first.</p>
<pre><code>ghpl 
36	Bump pyo3 from 0.22.2 to 0.23.3	dependabot/cargo/pyo3-0.23.3	OPEN	2024-12-04T03:52:03Z

gh pr close 36
✓ Closed pull request iesahin/xvc.py#36 (Bump pyo3 from 0.22.2 to 0.23.3)
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 We have already upgraded to pyo3 0.23. No need for this. Let’s create a PR for the current branch.</p>
<pre><code>git push --set-upstream origin v0.6.13

ghpC --fill
https://github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/pull/37
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 We can also tag and push the tags.</p>
<p>🐢 I’d like to have some more coverage for certain parts of the code. Let’s add some tests.</p>
<p>🐇 It looks like we mainly lack the storage tests. They need configuration to add keys to GitHub, and we already skip some of these even in the Rust code.</p>
<p>🐢 Umm, I see. We also need a way to measure coverage. Could we do this with Codecov, I wonder?</p>
<p>🐇 I found an example here: https://github.com/codecov/example-python/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml. It needs <code>coverage</code> and <code>pytest-cov</code> in the requirements.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s try this then.</p>
<p>🐇 Added <code>coverage.yml</code> file. It’s simpler than the other GitHub action. Need to update the token now.</p>
<p>🐢 There is an issue installing the requirements.</p>
<p>🐇 I forgot to add <code>sudo</code> to <code>apt-get</code>. Will take care of it now.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s check the run.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl
in_progress		Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12556590550	2m31s	2024-12-31T06:59:58Z
in_progress		Release v0.6.13	publish-to-pypi	v0.6.13	pull_request	12556590548	2m31s	2024-12-31T06:59:58Z
...
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 It takes a while and we still didn’t add the <code>CODECOV_TOKEN</code>.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s add it, and after that, we need to take a look at this <code>blink</code> configuration. It adds letters after the selection.</p>
<p>🐇 Added the secret and configured <code>xvc.py</code> for coverage. There is an error with the build, though. Maybe the command we should be using is <code>maturin develop</code> instead of <code>build</code> to make Xvc available for the environment.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s update and try it then.</p>
<p>🐇 <code>maturin develop</code> requires a virtual environment.</p>
<p>🐢 I checked the options for <code>build</code>, and I think there is an option, but let’s search first.</p>
<p>🐇 I searched, but it looks like we can just pass an <code>--out</code> directory or install <code>xvc</code> from the <code>target/wheels/</code> directory. The second option requires less maintenance.</p>
<p>🐢 Okay. Let’s add a step to the action then.</p>
<p>🐇 Now, let’s wait for the run to finish with <code>gh run watch</code>.</p>
<p>🐢 It failed. Let’s take a look at the logs:</p>
<pre><code>ghrl
completed	failure	Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12556939836	3m26s	2024-12-31T07:38:54Z

gh run view 12556939836 --log-failed
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 It looks like some of the tests are failing. Let’s run the tests locally.</p>
<p>🐢 We should run with the <code>--forked</code> option, and it looks like we have a test to update with the xvc file list.</p>
<p>🐇 Updated the test, and I noticed we forgot to supply the new <code>--show-directories</code> option in the Python interface.</p>
<p>🐢 Yep. Passing these options as command-line options in strings is not robust. It’s very easy to forget things. I think we should start using CLI structs directly, but it’s not time yet.</p>
<p>🐇 I agree. It’s one of the goals for building a GUI, actually.</p>
<p>🐢 The tests failed again.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl | rg failure
completed	failure	Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12557031091	3m49s	2024-12-31T07:51:19Z

gh run view 12557031091 --log-failed
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 There is a Git error now. We need to add a Git user and email to the action.</p>
<p>🐢 Added those and watching the results again now.</p>
<p>🐇 Why do you think the publish action always works? It can only run with the main branch, I think. No need to run it with other pushes.</p>
<p>🐢 Yes, let’s configure it now.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl | rg failure
completed	failure	Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12557083393	3m21s	2024-12-31T07:59:18Z

gh run view 12557083393 --log-failed
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 It looks like we also need <code>xvc-test-helper</code> in the path. Let’s <code>cargo install</code> it and add it to the path.</p>
<p>🐢 Added <code>.cargo/bin</code> to the path like:</p>
<pre><code class="language-yaml">- name: Add cargo bin to PATH
  run: echo "$HOME/.cargo/bin" &gt;&gt; $GITHUB_PATH
</code></pre>
<p>and installed the helper with <code>cargo install xvc-test-helper</code>.</p>
<p>🐇 By the way, GitHub Copilot is hallucinating about a method to update the path.</p>
<p>🐢 I searched and it may not be hallucinating. We can use the <code>::add-path::</code> command with <code>echo</code>, it looks like. This is new to me.</p>
<p>🐇 The tests failed again.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl | rg failure
completed	failure	Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12557208723	3m34s	2024-12-31T08:12:09Z

gh run view 12557208723 --log-failed
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 <code>file().list()</code> had a mistake, and we need to install <code>rg</code> for the tests.</p>
<p>🐇 Watching the test run. In the meantime, maybe we can review…</p>
<p>🐢 Failed again.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl | rg failure
completed	failure	Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12557294105	3m46s	2024-12-31T08:21:17Z

gh run view 12557294105 --log-failed
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 Added <code>db.commit()</code> to two places in the code. This should pass now.</p>
<p>🐢 Yeah!</p>
<pre><code>ghrl | head -n 1
completed	success	Release v0.6.13	coverage	v0.6.13	pull_request	12557509836	3m46s	2024-12-31T08:44:33Z

gh run view 12557509836

✓ v0.6.13 coverage iesahin/xvc.py#37 · 12557509836
Triggered via pull_request about 4 minutes ago

JOBS
✓ linux in 3m36s (ID 35010253915)

ANNOTATIONS
! ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
linux: .github#1


For more information about the job, try: gh run view --job=35010253915
View this run on GitHub: https://github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/actions/runs/12557509836
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 I can’t see a coverage report on codecov.io, though.</p>
<p>🐢 It says no coverage report is generated. Let’s test to generate XML files locally.</p>
<p>🐇 The option in the docs seems incorrect. <code>--cov-branch</code> doesn’t produce anything.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s wait for the run again.</p>
<p>🐇 Should we add a badge to the README?</p>
<p>🐢 It won’t show much, but yeah, let’s make it.</p>
<p>🐇 The results are in and it shows 100% coverage. This means it doesn’t actually test anything.</p>
<p>🐢 We need Rust coverage for this. Let’s search for it.</p>
<p>🐇 I found this: https://github.com/cjermain/rust-python-coverage. It runs <code>cargo llvm-cov</code> with the project and measures test coverage. But we don’t have any Rust tests.</p>
<p>🐢 It looks like we don’t need Rust tests. <code>cargo llvm-cov</code> can check coverage with the Python as well.</p>
<pre><code class="language-bash">$ cargo llvm-cov show-env --export-prefix
export RUSTFLAGS=" -C instrument-coverage --cfg coverage --cfg trybuild_no_target"
export LLVM_PROFILE_FILE="/home/.../rust-python-coverage/target/rust-python-coverage-%m.profraw"
export CARGO_INCREMENTAL="0"
export CARGO_LLVM_COV_TARGET_DIR="/home/.../rust-python-coverage/target"
</code></pre>
<hr>
<p>🐢 Let’s take a look at what remained for 0.6.13.</p>
<p>🐇 I think there is nothing left. Python must be published when we merged the PR.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s take a look by searching xvc python.</p>
<p>🐇 The PyPI page is https://pypi.org/project/xvc/ and it still reports the version as 0.6.11. There must be something.</p>
<p>🐢 Now let’s take a look at</p>
<p>https://github.com/iesahin/xvc.py</p>
<p>🐇 The run seems to be OK though.</p>
<p>https://github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/actions/runs/12557780141/job/35010938462</p>
<p>🐢 Maybe the version in <code>pyproject.toml</code> is still 0.6.11 and we forgot to update it?</p>
<p>tmux new-window -c $HOME/github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/ nvim</p>
<p>🐇 There is no version string in <code>~/github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/pyproject.toml</code>. It’s <em>dynamic</em>.</p>
<p>🐢 Then, let’s try to publish from local now.</p>
<p>🐇 The <code>iex</code> username requires email verification.</p>
<p>🐢 It looks like I publish xvc through the <code>iesahin</code> account, not <code>iex</code>. Maybe I can add both accounts to the project.</p>
<p>🐇 There seem to be no errors on the PyPI site.</p>
<p>🐢 Updating the token. Let’s add the token to pass to run <code>maturin publish</code>.</p>
<p>🐇 We’re receiving invalid or non-existent authentication information. Upgraded <code>maturin</code> to see if it fixes the issue.</p>
<p>🐢 We can also double-check the key.</p>
<p>🐇 Uploaded successfully from local. Let’s check the job again.</p>
<p>🐢 The release job was skipped because we didn’t tag after the merge. https://github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/actions/runs/12557780141/job/35011303045 That looks like the reason.</p>
<p>🐇 I should be more careful which is run and which is skipped.</p>
<p>🐢 Maybe we can relax the condition. We do this rarely. Maybe republishing is alright?</p>
<p>🐇 Yep, removed that. The jobs are running now. Let’s watch them to see what happens when we publish some of the packages.</p>
<p>🐢 In the meantime, let’s experiment with searching commands file with <code>fzf-lua</code>.</p>
<p>🐇 It requires more experimentation, but we can start from https://github.com/ibhagwan/fzf-lua/wiki/Advanced#interactive-shell-command.</p>
<p>🐢 The xvc publish jobs failed, btw.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl
completed	failure	Remove if condition from release	publish-to-pypi	v0.6.13	push	12568863716	15m26s	2025-01-01T08:30:03Z

gh run view 12568863716 --log-failed
...
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4.1.7	        Please ensure that your artifact is not expired and the artifact was uploaded using a compatible version of toolkit/upload-artifact.
...
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 It was using an older version of <code>upload-artifact</code>.</p>
<p>🐢 Rerunning the job and it looks like it runs for both push to <code>main</code> and tag with <code>v0.6.13</code>. We can turn off push to <code>main</code>, I believe.</p>
<p>🐇 There was a missing <code>upload-artifact</code> again. Fixed and updated the tags.</p>
<p>ghrl
completed	failure	update upload-artifacts	publish-to-pypi	main	push	12569060915	14m39s	2025-01-01T08:57:22Z</p>
<p>ghrf 12569060915</p>
<p>🐢 There are conflicts with uploaded artifacts now. We may need to clean up the artifacts manually.</p>
<p>🐇 The conflicts were not about inter-workflow names. The names were conflicting because all files were named <code>wheel</code>. I added the platform and target to the names to avoid conflicts.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s wait then. Maybe it will work this time. Could you search for a Lua console for Neovim?</p>
<p>🐇 Let’s try this one: return {
“yarospace/lua-console.nvim”,
lazy = true, keys = “`”, opts = {},
}</p>
<p>🐢 I couldn’t make it run but won’t spend much time ATM. How about the jobs?</p>
<pre><code>ghrl
completed	failure	update upload artifact names	publish-to-pypi	v0.6.13	push	12569298414	13m57s	2025-01-01T09:27:00Z

ghrf 12569298414
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9180510Z ##[group]Run actions/download-artifact@v4
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9182098Z with:
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9182859Z   name: wheels
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9183843Z   merge-multiple: false
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9184817Z   repository: iesahin/xvc.py
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9185820Z   run-id: 12569298414
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:52.9186903Z ##[endgroup]
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:53.1937617Z Downloading single artifact
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	2025-01-01T09:40:53.4694769Z ##[error]Unable to download artifact(s): Artifact not found for name: wheels
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	        Please ensure that your artifact is not expired and the artifact was uploaded using a compatible version of toolkit/upload-artifact.
Release	Run actions/download-artifact@v4	        For more information, visit the GitHub Artifacts FAQ: https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/main/packages/artifact/docs/faq.md
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 Now the download doesn’t work.</p>
<p>🐢 Update it to download using patterns.</p>
<p>🐇 Did so and let’s take a look at the jobs again.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl
completed	failure	added pattern to download	.github/workflows/publish.yml	main	push	12569456859	0s	2025-01-01T09:49:19Z

ghrv 12569456859

X main .github/workflows/publish.yml · 12569456859
Triggered via push about 3 minutes ago

X This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue.

For more information, see: https://github.com/iesahin/xvc.py/actions/runs/12569456859
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 The line with the pattern was reported as broken.</p>
<p>🐇  Removed it and recommitted.</p>
<pre><code>ghrl
✅ completed	success	remove pattern to download all	publish-to-pypi	v0.6.13	push	12569509435	14m41s	2025-01-01T09:58:49Z
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 And now this completes the <code>v0.6.13</code> release.</p>
<p>🐇 We’ll see how it will work next time.</p>
<p>🐢 Yep. Let’s move on to the GUI for now. Is that okay with you?</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Devlog 10: Codecov, Doctests, and Cargo Publish Struggles</title>
      <published>2025-01-19T09:30:49+00:00</published>
      <updated>2025-01-19T09:30:49+00:00</updated>
      <author>Emre Şahin</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://emresahin.net/devlog-10/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://emresahin.net/devlog-10/</guid>
      <description>🐢 Now we’re going into the real deep work. The only failure was the Codecov patch in Xvc. Let’s see what needs to be done. 🐇 It looks, from the coverage page , that our additions to HStore don’t have any tests. We can add some unit tests to new joins, maybe. 🐢 I don’t find unit tests particularly...</description>
      <category>Devlog</category>
      <category>XVC</category>
      <category>Rust</category>
      <category>cargo</category>
      <category>ecs</category>
      <category>Claude</category>
      <category>cargo-publish</category>
      <category>crates.io</category>
      <category>sqlite</category>
      <category>codecov</category>
      <category>doctests</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>🐢 Now we’re going into the real deep work. The only failure was the Codecov patch in Xvc. Let’s see what needs to be done.</p>
<p>🐇 It looks, from the <a href="https://app.codecov.io/gh/iesahin/xvc/pull/263?src=pr&amp;el=tree&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=github&amp;utm_content=comment&amp;utm_campaign=pr+comments&amp;utm_term=Emre+Sahin">coverage page</a>, that our additions to HStore don’t have any tests. We can add some unit tests to new joins, maybe.</p>
<p>🐢 I don’t find unit tests particularly useful, but let’s use GitHub Copilot to add tests for us.</p>
<p>🐇 Added a unit test and a doc test for <code>full_join</code>, and I think doc tests have more value. They provide documentation, and we can readily see how to use a function from its docs. Better to increase coverage with doc tests.</p>
<p>🐢 There are points that I should learn while writing doc tests. The imports must use the full path, not <code>crate::</code>. The tested struct also doesn’t have implicit imports.</p>
<p>🐇 The ceremony of adding keys and values is a bit too much. It may be worthwhile to add <code>insert</code> for any <code>Into&lt;XvcEntity&gt;</code>.</p>
<p>🐢 It will certainly save time if we don’t have to type <code>.into()</code> for each key :)</p>
<p>🐇 Pushed to test again. Should we have some means to test coverage locally?</p>
<p>🐢 I don’t think we need to consider coverage locally. It’s not worth our time.</p>
<p>🐇 Now while waiting for tests to be completed, what can we do?</p>
<pre><code>gh -R iesahin/xvc run list
completed	failure	v0.6.13	Rust-CI	v0.6.13	pull_request	12543831360	3m54s	2024-12-30T08:15:06Z
...
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 I don’t think it took too much time. Let’s view the results:</p>
<pre><code>gh -R iesahin/xvc run view 12543831360
...
  X Run Current Dev Tests
...
To see what failed, try: 
View this run on GitHub: https://github.com/iesahin/xvc/actions/runs/12543831360
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 The current dev tests fail for some reason. Let’s run these locally.</p>
<p>🐇 We’re missing <code>llvm-tools-preview</code> locally. How do we install this?</p>
<p>🐢 The command is:</p>
<pre><code>rustup component add llvm-tools-preview
info: component 'llvm-tools' for target 'aarch64-apple-darwin' is up to date
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 It’s already installed. We need to set the environment variables.</p>
<p>🐢 Instead, we can just turn off dev tests for the time being. We don’t need them. Our local tests pass.</p>
<p>🐇 Yeah, ok, we don’t need to solve each and every bit of these issues.</p>
<pre><code>gh -R iesahin/xvc run list
</code></pre>
<p>…
🐇 Ok. Let’s take a look at the run again.</p>
<pre><code>gh -R iesahin/xvc run list
completed	failure	v0.6.13	Rust-CI	v0.6.13	pull_request	12544020064	3m39s	2024-12-30T08:33:25Z

gh -R iesahin/xvc run view 12544020064
...
  X Test and Coverage
...

gh run view 12544020064 --log-failed
...
Test and Coverage (stable)	Test and Coverage	2024-12-30T08:36:58.8911690Z Error: ProcessError { stdout: "", stderr: "  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current\n                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed\n\r  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0\r  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0\ncurl: (7) Failed to connect to e1.xvc.dev port 80 after 160 ms: Couldn't connect to server\n" }
...
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 We need to start <code>nginx</code> on the server. We forgot it yesterday.</p>
<p>🐇 Ah, yeah. After adding that dufs installation. Ok.</p>
<p>🐢 We also need to add a reverse proxy to dufs somehow, but this is for later.</p>
<p>🐇 For the use case, I don’t think it’s necessary. We can just adjust the port to a non-standard one if we need to use 443 for another thing, but let’s take a look at the tests again.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s add another doc test. This time to <code>XvcStore</code>.</p>
<pre><code>cargo test -p xvc-ecs --doc
...
test result: ok. 8 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 2.87s
</code></pre>
<p>🐇 Sent the files again. Waiting for tests to finish.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s check the keymaps file in the meantime.</p>
<p>🐇 I tried to read some documentation but didn’t see an error. Maybe we should just set it to non-lazy and avoid allowing remaps.</p>
<p>🐢 We already spent too much time with this.</p>
<p>🐇 Yes, let’s take a look at the tests again.</p>
<pre><code>gh -R iesahin/xvc run list
completed	success	v0.6.13	Rust-CI	v0.6.13	pull_request	12544291068	8m10s	2024-12-30T09:00:42Z
...
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 Oh, yeah, the merge is ready.</p>
<p>🐇 Patch coverage is still behind the target, though.</p>
<p>🐢 Yeah, but let’s release this one and make the next better covered. Also, I’m not sure if the doc tests had any effect on coverage.</p>
<p>🐇 If we look at the <a href="https://app.codecov.io/gh/iesahin/xvc/pull/263?src=pr&amp;el=tree&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=github&amp;utm_content=comment&amp;utm_campaign=pr+comments&amp;utm_term=Emre+Sahin">coverage page</a> again, we can see if the doc tests had any effect.</p>
<p>🐢 It seems codecov.io doesn’t consider coverage for doc tests. This is a bit weird, but let’s not spend more time on this.</p>
<p>🐇 Sure, let’s merge.</p>
<p>🐢 I think we forgot to bump the version in <code>Cargo.toml</code>. We’ll have to do that in main.</p>
<p>🐇 Oh, yeah. Let’s bump it and tag as well.</p>
<p>🐢 Now, we can wait for all files to be produced. What will we do next?</p>
<p>🐇 We can just release the Python version as well. It shouldn’t need any changes.</p>
<p>🐢 Umm, right. Maybe we can add a few tests as well.</p>
<p>🐇 Let’s bump the version first and see.</p>
<p>🐢 Bumped versions in <code>Cargo.toml</code> and ran <code>maturin develop</code>.</p>
<p>🐇 It seems ready now.</p>
<p>🐢 The main fails, though. The “Publish Crates” action looks for <code>libsqlite3</code>. Let’s take a look at it.</p>
<pre><code>gh -R iesahin/xvc run list
completed	failure	Release v0.6.13	Publish Crates	v0.6.13	push	12544753359	6m1s	2024-12-30T09:41:56Z
</code></pre>
<p>🐢 The issue is that the VM doesn’t have <code>libsqlite3-dev</code>. Let’s add it.</p>
<p>🐇 We need to start the job manually again. Let’s not tag this time.</p>
<p>🐢 Some of the packages were already published. Now they break. <code>crates.io</code> says they’re already published. Maybe we can check if a package is already published.</p>
<p>🐇 Let’s check if we can make <code>cargo publish</code> more forgiving.</p>
<p>🐢 There doesn’t seem to be an option. Let’s search “how to skip published packages in the workspace to avoid errors with cargo publish”.</p>
<p>🐇 Claude is bullshitting again. Let’s try a manual approach: how to skip already published packages.</p>
<p>🐢 It may be easier to just add a check if the package is published. How do we get the info?</p>
<p>🐇 Or we can just go on to the next package if the package is already available.</p>
<p>🐢 Let’s do this manually this time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
